A deficiency judgment is a legal ruling that falls under foreclosure laws, allowing a lender in a recourse state to recover the remaining balance on a loan when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale don’t cover the outstanding debt.
In states that operate under non-recourse loans legislation, the lender generally can’t go after the borrower for a deficiency judgment.
Anti-deficiency laws are state statutes, sometimes known as anti-deficiency statutes, that limit or prohibit lenders from suing borrowers for deficiency balances after foreclosure. These laws are designed to protect consumers from being financially crippled by debt even after losing their homes to foreclosure. The specifics can vary widely from state to state, with some states offering substantial protections and others offering very limited or no protection at all.
The following states have anti-deficiency laws: Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin. However, some of these states have exceptions or limitations to their anti-deficiency laws.
For instance, California’s anti-deficiency law only applies to purchase money loans on owner-occupied residential properties with four or fewer units. If you want to learn more about the specific anti-deficiency laws in your state, you may want to consult a local real estate attorney or foreclosure lawyer.
The applicability of anti-deficiency laws varies widely based on jurisdiction, the nature of the loan, the type of property involved, and the actions of the borrower. These laws are state-specific and can have several exceptions and conditions where they may not apply.
In many states, anti-deficiency laws are specifically designed to protect borrowers who have taken out loans to purchase their primary residence. Therefore, these protections often do not extend to investment properties or second homes. This is particularly relevant for real estate investors who might own multiple properties. A foreclosure may occur on an investment property. If so, the lender might still have the right to pursue a deficiency judgment for the unpaid balance of the loan.
Anti-deficiency laws often focus on residential properties, and commercial real estate loans are generally not covered. A business might default on a commercial real estate loan. If this is the case, the lender is typically entitled to seek a deficiency judgment against the business or the business owners, depending on how the loan agreement is structured.
The borrower could have engaged in acts of bad faith, such as deliberately damaging the property or providing false information on loan documents. In this case, the protections afforded by anti-deficiency laws may be voided. Courts often see such actions as grounds for allowing lenders to pursue deficiency judgments, regardless of state protections.
The protections afforded by anti-deficiency statutes often depend on the loan’s purpose. For instance, if the mortgage was taken out to purchase the property, it is more likely to be covered by anti-deficiency laws. On the other hand, loans taken out for other reasons, such as a home equity line of credit or refinancing, might not be eligible for such protection.
In some states, only specific types of loans, like first mortgages or purchase-money loans, are covered by anti-deficiency laws. Subsequent refinancing, second mortgages, or home equity lines of credit may not offer the same protections.
Each state can have additional unique criteria that must be met for anti-deficiency laws to apply. These could include factors like whether the borrower lived in the property for a certain period, whether the foreclosure was judicial or non-judicial, or even how the loan was structured.
You might not pay the deficiency balance after a deficiency judgment has been issued against you. If not, the lender has the legal right to recover the outstanding amount, and the implications for you can be substantial and long-lasting. Here’s what could happen:
One of the most direct ways a lender can recover a deficiency balance is through wage garnishment. The lender would go through the legal process to have a portion of your paycheck diverted directly to them until the deficiency is paid off. This can have an immediate and palpable impact on your day-to-day finances as you’ll be taking home less money.
Lenders can also seize funds directly from your bank accounts. Like wage garnishment, this requires a legal process where the lender gets a court’s permission to take money straight from your bank accounts to cover the deficiency. This could significantly disrupt your financial stability.
A lien can be placed on your other real estate properties or valuable assets. A lien doesn’t immediately give the lender the cash they’re seeking, but it does mean you can’t sell or refinance those properties without first paying off the deficiency. The lien remains until the debt is settled, complicating any future financial transactions involving that property.
Failing to pay a deficiency balance can wreak havoc on your credit score. The judgment will be reported to credit agencies and will stay on your credit report for several years. A lower credit score can make everything from renting an apartment to getting a new job more challenging and can increase the interest rates you pay on future loans.
In extreme cases, failing to pay could lead to additional legal action. This might mean further court dates and more financial judgments against you. The lender may also be entitled to charge interest on the unpaid balance, meaning the amount you owe could grow over time, complicating your financial situation further.
Beyond the tangible impacts, the stress and worry associated with significant debt and the potential for ongoing legal proceedings can take a mental and emotional toll on you and your family. The strain on your resources and well-being can be a lingering challenge even after the debt is eventually resolved.
Because of these serious consequences, it’s best to be proactive in dealing with a deficiency judgment. Options may include negotiating with the lender for a reduced payoff amount or setting up a payment plan. Given the complexity and stakes involved, it’s advisable to consult an experienced attorney who can guide you through your options and help you make informed decisions.
The one-action rule is a principle that restricts lenders to only one legal action to recover a debt against a borrower. This means that a lender must choose either to foreclose on the property or to sue for the deficiency balance, but not both. However, this rule varies from state to state, and there may be exceptions.
In some jurisdictions and under certain circumstances, borrowers may have the option to waive their rights to anti-deficiency protections, often as a condition to secure the loan. If the borrower knowingly and voluntarily waives this right, the lender may proceed with a deficiency judgment even in states where anti-deficiency laws exist.
Yes. If you are facing foreclosure or have questions regarding deficiency judgments, it is highly recommended that you consult a foreclosure lawyer. LegalMatch can help you find a qualified attorney to guide you through the complexities of your case and potentially save you from severe financial setbacks.
16 people have successfully posted their cases
