In California, providing false information on a job application or resume, be it lying about having a degree, previous job experience, or other qualifications, can be grounds for termination.
Employers have the right to ensure that their employees are truthful and qualified for their positions. Lying or committing fraud in such documents can breach the trust an employer places in an employee.
Not necessarily. An inconsistency may arise from an oversight, misunderstanding, or unintentional error on an application or resume. A lie, on the other hand, is a deliberate misrepresentation of facts. Employers typically evaluate the nature and gravity of any inconsistencies to determine whether it was a genuine mistake or intentional deceit.
Misrepresentation of age by a minor often refers to when a minor provides false information, usually indicating they are older, to gain access to privileges or opportunities restricted to adults. This can be especially problematic if a minor seeks employment that has age-specific requirements, such as selling or serving alcohol:
In essence, while the initial act of age misrepresentation might seem benign or even advantageous for the minor, the ripple effects of such a decision can have profound implications for both the individual and the business involved.
Beyond termination, lying on a job application or resume can lead to several other repercussions. The employer may deny any benefits that the employee might have earned while on the job. Additionally, if the lie can be linked to any form of monetary gain, there might be legal consequences. Future employment opportunities can also be jeopardized, as some employers may share information about untrustworthy former employees.
Suppose an employee falsely claims to have a specific certification, leading to a higher salary or a special benefits package. If the deception is discovered, the employer might retract bonuses, withhold accrued vacation pay. The employer might also deny other benefits like stock options or end-of-year bonuses that the employee would have otherwise earned.
In some cases, employers can even attempt to recover previously paid benefits if they can prove that they were awarded based on fraudulent claims.
Consider an employee who lies about having an advanced degree to secure a high-paying job as a financial consultant. If this deceit leads to incorrect financial advice and subsequent monetary losses for clients, the employer might face lawsuits. The employee, too, could face legal action for misrepresentation and fraud.
Such legal actions can lead to significant fines, restitution, or even imprisonment, depending on the severity of the consequences resulting from the lie.
For example, after discovering an employee’s falsification of credentials, an employer might choose to provide only a minimal reference or explicitly inform potential future employers of the deceit when contacted for a job reference.
Some industries also have shared databases or blacklists (though not always formally recognized) where employees found guilty of gross misconduct, including lying about qualifications, can be listed. This can make finding subsequent employment in the same field exceptionally challenging. Also, with the rise of professional networking sites like LinkedIn, word can travel fast within industries about an individual’s professional conduct and integrity.
Remember, the consequences of misrepresenting yourself on a job application or resume aren’t just immediate. They can have long-lasting effects on your professional reputation and career trajectory.
While providing false information is not condoned, employees may have some defenses under California law. They can argue that the misinformation was a genuine mistake or that the misrepresented fact was not a crucial qualification for the job. Also, if an employer knew about the lie but still hired the person, this can also be used as a defense in certain situations.
Let’s dive deeper into each of these defenses.
Not every inaccuracy on a job application or resume is a deliberate falsehood. It’s possible to make genuine mistakes, especially if the information is complex or if there was a misunderstanding regarding what was being asked. For example, someone might list the wrong year for a job start date or mistakenly believe they had completed certain certifications when, in reality, they had not.
Example: An individual may have believed they completed all the requirements for a degree but later discovered they were a few credits short. If this is a genuine oversight and not an intentional misrepresentation, it can be used as a defense.
For this defense to be effective, the employee would likely need to provide evidence supporting their claim that the misinformation was a genuine mistake. This evidence may include emails, transcripts, or other relevant documents.
For this defense, the argument is that even though there was a misrepresentation, the fact in question was not a determining factor in the hiring decision or crucial to the performance of the job’s essential functions.
An applicant might have lied about being fluent in a second language for a job that does not require any knowledge of that language. If all other qualifications were met and the lie had no bearing on job performance, this could be a defense against termination or other punitive actions.
This defense would largely depend on job descriptions, hiring advertisements, or any other documentation that outlines the essential qualifications and responsibilities of the position.
If an employer was aware of the misrepresentation but chose to hire the individual anyway, it can serve as a potential defense against adverse actions later on. This could be because the employer deemed the inaccuracy as insignificant at the time or had other reasons to overlook it.
Suppose an employer is impressed with a candidate’s experience and skill set during the interview. They might decide to hire them despite knowing the candidate does not possess a claimed degree or certification.
For this defense to work, the employee would need evidence, such as communications (emails or written acknowledgments), which indicates the employer’s awareness and acceptance of the discrepancy. A California employment law attorney can provide guidance, clarify your rights, and help determine the best course of action.
If you believe you have been wrongfully terminated due to inaccuracies on your job application or resume, consult with a lawyer.
For advice tailored to your situation, connect with a dedicated California employment lawyer through LegalMatch today.
16 people have successfully posted their cases
