An exculpatory clause is a contractual term by which one party attempts to limit its liability in the event of specific harm or damages to another party. In simpler terms, it’s a contract clause that can absolve a party from being held liable for any harm that might occur to the other party during the execution of the contract.
The term “exculpate” comes from the Latin “exculpate,” meaning “to clear from blame.” So, an exculpatory clause is designed to clear one party from being blamed or held responsible for specific outcomes, often those that could be seen as negative or harmful. Such clauses are typically drafted to protect service providers from the consequences of actions that are out of their control.
An exculpatory clause in real estate contracts is commonly used to limit the liability of a lender in the event of a default by the borrower. A non-recourse loan is a common example, where the lender’s recovery is limited to the collateral securing the loan (i.e., the property), and the borrower is not personally liable.
In this context, an exculpatory clause essentially says, “In the event that the borrower cannot repay this loan, the lender agrees to not go after the borrower’s personal assets and can only seize the property that was purchased with the loan funds.”
This can be beneficial to the borrower, as it can protect their other assets from being seized in the event that they cannot repay the loan. However, because this type of clause can limit the lender’s ability to recoup their funds, loans with exculpatory clauses can be riskier for the lender and can often come with higher interest rates.
On the other hand, exculpatory clauses in real estate could be included in rental agreements to limit the liability of the landlord. For instance, a landlord may include an exculpatory clause that absolves them of responsibility for damage to a tenant’s property caused by problems with the building or other tenants.
Is This the Same as an Exculpatory Agreement?
As for the question of whether an exculpatory clause is the same as an exculpatory agreement, these are closely related but have different scopes. An exculpatory agreement (also known as a liability waiver or release of liability) is a separate agreement where one party agrees not to hold the other party liable for any damages or injuries that might occur under certain conditions. It’s a broader agreement that could contain several exculpatory clauses.
For example, when you join a gym, you might sign an exculpatory agreement that includes clauses stating the gym is not responsible if you hurt yourself while working out or if your belongings are stolen from the locker room. Those specific stipulations are the exculpatory clauses within the broader exculpatory agreement.
However, these clauses and agreements are subject to certain limitations, and their enforceability can depend on the specific facts of the case, the nature of the service or action being performed, and the jurisdiction’s particular laws and regulations.
Courts sometimes view these clauses skeptically because they can be seen as unjustly benefiting one party at the expense of the other, particularly in situations where there is a significant power or knowledge imbalance between the parties. Therefore, for an exculpatory clause to be upheld, it usually needs to be written in clear and unambiguous language, and the circumstances of its signing should be fair and open.
What Are Some Examples of Exculpatory Clauses?
Exculpatory clauses are used in a variety of contexts to limit liability. Below are some examples of exculpatory provisions:
- Real Estate Lease Agreements: In a lease agreement, an exculpatory clause may limit the landlord’s liability for certain damages. This could be something like: “The tenant agrees that the landlord is not responsible for any personal property damages resulting from plumbing malfunctions or burglaries.”
- Gym Membership Agreements: These often include exculpatory clauses to limit the gym’s liability for injuries sustained by members. A clause in such an agreement might read: “The member acknowledges that the use of gym equipment involves risk of injury and agrees that the gym will not be held liable for any injuries sustained during the use of the gym’s facilities.”
- Outdoor Activity Waivers: Ski resorts, white water rafting companies, or rock climbing gyms might have participants sign agreements with exculpatory clauses. An example: “The participant assumes all risks associated with this activity, including but not limited to falls, contact with other participants, and weather conditions, and agrees not to hold the company responsible for any injuries.”
- Car Parking Agreements: Many parking lots and garages have exculpatory clauses limiting their liability for any damage or theft that occurs to vehicles while they are parked in their lot or garage. An example could be: “The company is not responsible for any damages to or theft from vehicles parked in this facility.”
- Professional Services Agreements: Certain professional services providers like lawyers or accountants may include exculpatory clauses in their contracts with clients. These might say: “The client agrees that the service provider is not liable for any losses resulting from advice given in good faith, but which subsequently proves to be inaccurate or disadvantageous.”
- Employment Contracts: These might include exculpatory clauses that absolve the employer of liability for certain occurrences. For instance: “The employee understands and accepts that the employer will not be held liable for damages or losses resulting from acts of God, fire, theft, or other unforeseen circumstances beyond the employer’s control.”
While these examples are fairly common, their enforceability depends greatly on the specifics of the situation and the jurisdiction’s law. Some jurisdictions place restrictions on the use of exculpatory clauses, especially in cases involving gross negligence or willful misconduct. And in any case, the language of the clause must typically be clear, unambiguous, and conspicuous for it to be enforceable.
Are Exculpatory Clauses Enforceable?
In general, contract law in the United States is governed by state and federal laws, and no uniform law applies to all exculpatory clauses.
That said, some general principles tend to apply:
- Clear and Unambiguous Language: For an exculpatory clause to be enforceable, it generally must be written in clear and unambiguous language. It should leave no doubt as to what the signing party is agreeing to. Vague or overly broad language can lead to a court deciding the clause is unenforceable.
- Not Against Public Policy: An exculpatory clause cannot absolve a party of liability for behavior that’s against public policy. For instance, an exculpatory clause cannot protect a party from liability for intentional or reckless behavior, gross negligence, or conduct that’s in violation of the law.
- Fairness and Openness: Courts are more likely to enforce an exculpatory clause if the signing process is fair and open. For instance, a court might find it unenforceable if the clause was hidden in fine print and not pointed out to the signing party. Similarly, if there was a significant power imbalance between the parties, the clause may be deemed unenforceable.
- Essential Services: Exculpatory clauses for essential services like medical care, public utilities, or housing are often viewed skeptically by courts and, in some cases, may not be enforceable. This is because these services are seen as a public necessity, and providers should not be able to limit their liability in providing them.
- Businesses Open to Public: In some jurisdictions, exculpatory clauses are not allowed in businesses open to the public, like hotels or restaurants. The argument is that these businesses have a duty of care to their customers that they cannot contract out of.
- Insurance: An insurance company typically can’t use an exculpatory clause to limit its liability. The nature of an insurance contract is that the insurer assumes certain risks for the insured, and an exculpatory clause would undermine this.
Again, the enforceability of an exculpatory clause will depend greatly on the specifics of the situation and the jurisdiction. The party wishing to enforce such a clause should consult with a lawyer to ensure it’s likely to be enforceable, and the party asked to sign such a clause should fully understand what they agree to before signing.
Should I Consult a Contract Attorney About an Exculpatory Clause?
Yes, if you are considering entering into a contract with an exculpatory clause or if you are being asked to sign a waiver that includes one, you should definitely consult with an experienced contract lawyer.
Exculpatory clauses can have serious implications. They can limit or completely absolve another party of liability for certain actions or events, which could mean you end up assuming risks that could be significant. An attorney can help you understand the implications of the clause, advise you on whether it is likely to be enforceable, and possibly negotiate changes to the contract on your behalf.
LegalMatch is an excellent resource for finding a contract attorney. LegalMatch can match you with an attorney who is experienced in contract law and familiar with your local jurisdiction. LegalMatch makes it easier for you to find the right attorney and provides the peace of mind of knowing you are getting qualified legal advice.
So, if you’re facing a contract with an exculpatory clause, don’t hesitate to use LegalMatch to connect with a contract attorney.
Matthew Izzi
LegalMatch Legal Writer
Original Author
Jose Rivera, J.D.
Managing Editor
Editor
Last Updated: Jul 17, 2023