An extradition clause is a provision in a treaty, agreement, or legislation that establishes the legal framework for one country (the requesting state) to seek the return of a person from another country (the requested state) to face prosecution or serve a sentence for a crime committed in the requesting state.
Extradition clauses typically set out the conditions and procedures for extradition, including the offenses that are considered extraditable and the necessary documentation to support an extradition request.
Extradition proceedings are the legal processes that take place when one country requests the extradition of a person from another country. These proceedings generally involve a series of steps, including:
- Submission of an extradition request by the requesting state to the requested state, supported by necessary documentation such as a warrant of arrest or a court order.
- Assessment of the request by the requested state to determine if it meets the requirements set out in the relevant extradition treaty or domestic laws.
- If the request is deemed valid, the requested state may arrest and detain the person sought for extradition.
- The case may then be brought before a court in the requested state to determine whether the person should be extradited. The court will evaluate whether the request complies with the applicable legal requirements and whether there are any grounds to refuse extradition.
- If the court approves the extradition, the requested state’s executive authority (e.g., the president or a minister) may have the final say in whether to extradite the person.
- If the extradition is approved, the person is transferred to the custody of the requesting state to face prosecution or serve their sentence.
What Is the Extradition Law Between States?
Extradition law between states refers to the legal framework that governs the process of transferring a person accused or convicted of a crime from one state to another state.
In the United States, extradition between states is governed by the U.S. Constitution’s Extradition Clause (Article IV, Section 2) and federal statutes, such as the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (UCEA), which many states have adopted to create a consistent legal framework for interstate extradition.
State laws regarding extradition generally adhere to the principles established in the U.S. Constitution and federal statutes. These laws typically outline the procedures for requesting extradition, the types of offenses that qualify for extradition, and the process for challenging extradition.
In many cases, extradition between states is a more straightforward process than international extradition, as states often have more consistent legal systems and shared law enforcement objectives.
What Is International Extradition?
International extradition is the formal process by which a person who is accused or convicted of a crime in one country (the requesting state) is returned from another country (the requested state) to face prosecution or serve a sentence.
International extradition is generally governed by bilateral or multilateral treaties between countries, which establish the conditions, procedures, and requirements for extradition. In the absence of a treaty, countries may still extradite individuals based on the principle of reciprocity or through ad hoc arrangements.
What Are Some Exceptions to International Extradition?
There are several exceptions to international extradition, which may lead a requested state to deny an extradition request. Some common exceptions include:
- Political offenses: Many extradition treaties contain a political offense exception, which prevents extradition for crimes that are deemed political in nature. This exception is designed to protect individuals who may be targeted for their political beliefs or activities. However, the definition of a political offense can vary and is often subject to interpretation.
- Dual criminality: Extradition treaties usually require that the alleged crime be considered a criminal offense in both the requesting and the requested state. This principle, known as dual criminality, ensures that individuals are only extradited for actions that are universally recognized as criminal.
- Risk of torture or inhumane treatment: If there is a substantial risk that the individual will be subjected to torture or inhumane treatment in the requesting state, the requested state may refuse extradition based on human rights concerns.
- Nationality: Some countries may refuse to extradite their own citizens, either as a matter of national policy or based on provisions in their extradition treaties. In such cases, the requested state may choose to prosecute the individual domestically for the alleged crime.
- Statute of limitations: If the alleged crime is subject to a statute of limitations in either the requesting or the requested state, and the time period has expired, extradition may be denied.
- Ne bis in idem (double jeopardy): Extradition may be refused if the person sought has already been tried and acquitted or convicted of the same offense in the requested state.
- Humanitarian grounds: In some cases, extradition may be denied on humanitarian grounds, such as the age, health, or personal circumstances of the individual sought for extradition.
- Lack of sufficient evidence: Extradition may be denied if the requested state determines that there is not enough evidence to support the allegations against the individual. The requesting state must typically provide a prima facie case or a reasonable basis to believe that the person sought committed the alleged offense.
- Military offenses: Some extradition treaties exclude military offenses that do not constitute criminal acts under general criminal law. This exception is intended to prevent extradition for offenses that are unique to military law, such as desertion or insubordination.
- Capital punishment: If the crime for which the individual is sought is punishable by death in the requesting state, and the requested state does not have the death penalty or has strong objections to its use, extradition may be denied. In some cases, the requested state may agree to extradite the individual only if the requesting state provides assurances that the death penalty will not be imposed or carried out.
- Non-extradition for fiscal offenses: Some extradition treaties or domestic laws exclude fiscal offenses, such as tax evasion or customs violations, from the list of extraditable crimes. This exception is based on the principle that such offenses are primarily of concern to the requesting state and do not warrant international cooperation to the same extent as other crimes.
- Pending proceedings in the requested state: Extradition may be refused if the person sought is already under investigation or prosecution for the same offense in the requested state. This exception ensures that domestic proceedings take precedence over international requests for extradition.
These exceptions may be explicitly stated in the applicable extradition treaty or may be based on the domestic laws and policies of the requested state. The decision to grant or deny extradition is often subject to the discretion of the requested state’s authorities, and these exceptions may be invoked as grounds for refusal.
Should I Contact a Lawyer?
If you are involved in an extradition case, whether as the subject of an extradition request or as a concerned party, seek legal advice and representation from a qualified criminal lawyer. Extradition proceedings can be complex, involving both domestic and international laws, and the consequences of extradition can be life-changing.
LegalMatch is a platform that can help you find the right criminal lawyer for your case. By submitting your case through LegalMatch, you can connect with experienced lawyers who specialize in extradition and criminal law. They can guide you through the legal process, protect your rights, and provide advice tailored to your specific situation.
To get started, use LegalMatch and provide the necessary information about your case today.
Ken LaMance
Senior Editor
Original Author
Jose Rivera
Managing Editor
Editor
Last Updated: May 19, 2023