GHB (also known as GBL), used as a nutritional supplement and medically prescribed, stimulates hormones and promotes muscular growth.
GHB users reported the following side effects:
Comas, breathing issues, unconsciousness, seizures, tremors, and violent behavior were some of the more severe side effects.
The product has been deemed hazardous and illegal by the Federal Drug Administration, which has acknowledged the connection between these adverse responses and the drug.
Every year, unfavorable drug responses and side effects result in significant injuries to many Americans as well as fatalities. Legally, drug companies must promote only medicines that are risk-free. Before prescription medications are made available to the general public, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducts safety and efficacy evaluations.
Even FDA-approved medications could potentially have negative side effects that weren’t identified during the approval procedure. Incorrect pharmaceutical administration or drug interactions in the body can have negative effects, especially if a person is taking many prescriptions at once.
A prescription drug lawsuit may be necessary if a person suffers harm from using a prescription drug. They may be able to receive compensation as a result from medical professionals or drug makers.
A high alert drug or medication (HAM) is one that, if used differently from how it has been prescribed, carries a higher risk of causing serious injury. These high-alert drugs are hazardous because minute variations in dosage or blood levels of the drug might result in life-threatening situations.
Additionally, adverse effects brought on by mistakes in the administration of HAMs can result in disability, hospitalization, or even death. They can also be chronic, life-threatening, or even permanent.
These medicines differ from over-the-counter medicines like aspirin or ibuprofen. Even though these drugs can be misused, a slight variation in dosage is unlikely to be fatal.
HAMs are unique. Small variations in the dosage might have severe consequences and could result in death. According to the contexts in which they are used, the Institute for Safe Medication Practices has divided high-risk drugs into three groups. These are the categories:
High alert drugs in acute care settings, high alert medications in long-term care settings, and high alert medications in community/ambulatory care settings.
The following are some HAM examples:
When properly prescribed and closely followed by a doctor’s prescription, all of these drugs have the potential to be life-saving treatments. Their consequences could be fatal if used improperly or contrary to instructions. On the Internet, a directory of all HAMs is freely accessible.
Regular usage of these drugs may need different types of monitoring. To prevent errors, there are frequently precise protocols for providing these medications in hospitals and long-term care facilities. If someone or a loved one is taking a medicine that is on the HAM list, they might want to discuss their treatment with their doctor so they can rest easy knowing that the prescription is administered according to the necessary standards.
It is crucial to remember that substances other than those on the HAMs list can also cause harm to a person. Even when taken as directed, all drugs have the potential to produce negative side effects. Additionally, drug interactions might have negative effects on health.
Millions of Americans currently use prescription medications like Invokana and Coumadin in the United States. These prescription medicines aid in the treatment of numerous illnesses and infections.
The serious adverse effects that many prescription medications have, however, are a major issue. The number of personal injuries that happen as a result of poor warning labels, such as the absence of a warning label on Januvia or Daytrana, or recommendations by pharmacy chains or physicians, is rising quickly. The “learned intermediary doctrine,” as it is often known today, mandates that doctors—rather than pharmaceutical companies—provide proper warnings.
According to the learned intermediary philosophy, customers must be sufficiently warned by doctors, not by the makers of prescription drugs. The learned intermediary doctrine is relevant to implants, medical devices, etc. Because doctors, not medication producers, are in the best position to adequately warn their patients of any potential side effects, courts have mostly relied on this approach.
There are a few situations in which producers of prescription drugs are not required to provide proper warnings. These exclusions consist of:
One should speak with the doctor who prescribed the prescription if they believe any of the medications on the HAM list—or any other medications they may be taking—are hurting their health. A patient should see another doctor if their doctor is unable to provide appropriate answers.
A person may speak with an unsafe medications lawyer, who is a lawyer who focuses on medical malpractice or product liability claims if they suspect that taking HAMs or any other prescription medication has already had a negative impact on their health.
To assess if any negative effects on a person’s health are the consequence of a mistake made by the doctor or other health care provider in prescribing the medicine, a malpractice or products liability attorney will examine the facts of a person’s case. Alternatively, the attorney can find that the drug is flawed in some way and that the drug’s manufacturer, a pharmaceutical firm, is to blame.
Additionally, one may report negative drug responses to the FDA’s MedWatch program. The MedWatch program was created in order to collect complaints of severe reactions, issues with product quality, unsuccessful therapeutic interventions, and mistakes made when using medicinal items for individuals. Drugs, biologic products, medical equipment, nutritional supplements, infant formula, and cosmetics are just a few of the products that can be reported.
A person might contact their doctor for help with the report if they were prescribed the medicine they wish to mention. However, a person can complete the form on their own if they choose not to consult their doctor for any reason. Another option is to speak with a lawyer before reporting something to the MedWatch program. The FDA has received and acknowledged these reports.
It is crucial to remember that reporting drug side effects to the MedWatch program may be beneficial for the FDA’s efforts to better regulate drugs. However, it is not a means of recovering compensation for any harm the drug may have done to a person. That calls for legal action.
Consult a doctor if you have developed significant health issues after ingesting GHB. You could also get in touch with a class action lawyer who can assist you in defending your legal rights and recovering damages for your injuries.
16 people have successfully posted their cases
