A guilty plea is a formal admission of responsibility for a crime given by a defendant in a criminal case. By pleading guilty, the defendant acknowledges their guilt for the crime charged, waives their right to a trial, and accepts the punishment determined by the court.
It’s possible to withdraw a guilty plea, but it’s not always easy, and the specific circumstances of your case play a big role.
Not exactly. A reversal of a guilty plea refers to an appellate court’s decision to overturn a lower court’s judgment. A defendant can seek to have their guilty plea reversed on appeal, but this is different from seeking to withdraw the plea. The appeal would argue that the lower court erred in some way, such as by accepting a plea that was not knowing and voluntary.
A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the defendant. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to a particular charge in return for some concession from the prosecutor. This might be a reduction in the severity of the charges, a recommendation for a lighter sentence, or an agreement to drop other charges.
Before sentencing, most jurisdictions allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea “for any reason or no reason.” The defendant must demonstrate to the court that the plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Courts tend to be more lenient in this regard prior to sentencing because there hasn’t yet been a “final judgment” in the case. The defendant would need to file a motion to withdraw the plea and then argue the motion before the court.
Withdrawing a guilty plea after sentencing is more difficult. In general, the defendant has to show a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing the plea. This could be evidence of innocence, the emergence of new evidence, or evidence that the plea was not knowing and voluntary. It’s also necessary to demonstrate that the withdrawal would not harm the prosecution (for instance, by arguing that the prosecution’s evidence has not been lost or diminished in the time since the plea).
If a defendant’s lawyer was incompetent, this could be grounds for withdrawing a guilty plea. In order to succeed, the defendant would need to show that the lawyer’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that there’s a reasonable probability that, but for the lawyer’s errors, the defendant would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.
Usually, this is referred to as a claim of “ineffective assistance of counsel.” It can be a challenging claim to win because courts tend to be deferential to defense attorneys’ strategic decisions.
Let’s consider a defendant, Mr. Smith. He was arrested for a serious felony charge of armed robbery. Given the seriousness of the charge, he could potentially face many years in prison if convicted. Mr. Smith decides to hire a lawyer, Attorney Johnson, to represent him in court.
Throughout the process, Attorney Johnson demonstrates a lack of understanding of the complexities of the case. He doesn’t spend much time preparing for the case, doesn’t discuss the case thoroughly with Mr. Smith, doesn’t thoroughly investigate potential evidence, and doesn’t consult any potential witnesses who might be able to provide an alibi for Mr. Smith.
In addition, Attorney Johnson does not clearly explain the implications of pleading guilty to Mr. Smith. Johnson tells Smith that the prosecution has a solid case and suggests that Smith should accept the plea deal offered by the prosecution, which includes a prison sentence, without fully discussing other potential strategies or the possibility of going to trial.
Feeling overwhelmed and scared and trusting in his lawyer’s advice, Mr. Smith decides to plead guilty. He’s subsequently sentenced to several years in prison based on his plea.
After sentencing, Mr. Smith starts to question the competence of his lawyer. He feels that he was rushed into a plea deal without fully understanding the implications and that the lawyer failed to consider crucial aspects of his case. He decides to consult another lawyer.
The new lawyer, Attorney Williams, reviews the case and finds that there were indeed numerous witnesses who could have testified in Mr. Smith’s favor, thus supporting an alibi defense. Williams also identifies that Attorney Johnson failed to challenge potentially inadmissible evidence. Based on these findings, Williams concludes that Johnson’s representation was deficient, falling below the standard of competence expected of criminal defense attorneys.
With this information, Attorney Williams files a motion to withdraw Mr. Smith’s guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion argues that Johnson’s performance was objectively unreasonable and that there’s a reasonable probability that, but for Johnson’s errors, Mr. Smith would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.
After reviewing the evidence presented, the court grants the motion to withdraw the guilty plea. As a result, Mr. Smith’s case is set for a new trial, where he is able to mount a more effective defense with his new counsel.
The amount of time you have to withdraw a guilty plea varies by jurisdiction. It is always better to act as soon as possible if you believe you have grounds for withdrawal.
Prior to sentencing, the court generally allows for a relatively short window to withdraw a plea, typically within a matter of days or weeks, depending on local rules and regulations. After sentencing, the timeline becomes more complicated. You may have several months to a year to appeal the sentence, but withdrawing a plea specifically may be more restrictive and could require demonstrating why it took longer to file.
Keep in mind withdrawing a guilty plea after sentencing is a difficult process and less likely to be granted. It’s also important to understand that many factors, such as the complexity of the case, court schedules, and applicable laws, can influence timelines for these procedures.
If a court grants a withdrawal of a guilty plea, the case essentially reverts back to its status before the plea was entered. The defendant regains all of their constitutional rights that were waived by entering the plea, including the right to a jury trial, the right to confront witnesses, and the right against self-incrimination.
If a plea bargain was in place, that usually gets nullified as well. This means that any concessions made by the prosecution in the plea bargain, such as agreeing to lesser charges or a lighter sentence, would no longer be guaranteed.
The defendant would then either negotiate a new plea deal with the prosecution or proceed to trial. If found guilty at trial, the defendant could potentially face a harsher final sentence than what was agreed to in the original plea bargain.
If you or a loved one are considering withdrawing a guilty plea, speak with an experienced criminal lawyer first. Each case is unique, and having professional legal advice can make a significant difference in the outcome.
Through LegalMatch, you can find the right criminal defense attorney for your case. LegalMatch has a broad network of experienced attorneys who can provide guidance tailored to your specific situation. Don’t wait. Start your search for a criminal lawyer today.
16 people have successfully posted their cases
